K vs. LYB
K (Kellogg Company) and LYB (LyondellBasell Industries N.V.) are both stocks. K operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while LYB operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
K vs. LYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LYB
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- YTD
- 47.20%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- -6.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $264.40M | $296.89M | $349.44M |
K vs. LYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 0.00% | 5.99% | 49.75% | -7.44% | 14.35% | 7.44% | -6.78% | 26.08% | -13.32% | -4.93% |
LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 47.20% | -35.96% | -17.38% | 20.70% | -0.98% | 5.07% | 2.64% | 44.63% | -21.69% | 33.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between K and LYB is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2010 | 0.19 |
The correlation between K and LYB shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
K:
$29.20B
LYB:
$20.12B
K:
$3.65
LYB:
-$3.58
K:
2.30
LYB:
0.60
K:
$12.67B
LYB:
$22.48B
K:
$4.41B
LYB:
-$4.33B
K:
$2.25B
LYB:
$935.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
K vs. LYB — Risk / Return Rank
K
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LYB
K vs. LYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| K | LYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
K vs. LYB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| K | LYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -63.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -30.92% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.23% | — |
Volatility
K vs. LYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| K | LYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 45.86% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 32.81% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 36.79% | — |
Dividends
K vs. LYB - Dividend Comparison
K has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 1.39% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 6.61% | 12.59% | 7.10% | 5.20% | 11.92% | 4.81% | 4.58% | 20.27% | 4.81% | 3.22% | 3.88% | 3.50% |
Financials
K vs. LYB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and LyondellBasell Industries N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
K and LYB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for K and LYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer