PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K vs. LYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K vs. LYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LYB

1D
-2.54%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
52.35%
6M
52.17%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
-4.03%
5Y*
-4.78%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. LYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
52.35%-35.96%-17.38%20.70%-0.98%5.07%2.64%44.63%-21.69%33.72%

Correlation

The correlation between K and LYB is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2010

0.19

The correlation between K and LYB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

K:

$3.65

LYB:

-$3.19

PS Ratio

K:

2.30

LYB:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

K:

$12.67B

LYB:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K:

$4.41B

LYB:

-$4.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

K:

$2.25B

LYB:

$935.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K vs. LYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K

LYB
LYB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. LYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

K vs. LYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

K vs. LYB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.88%

Volatility

K vs. LYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.75%

Dividends

K vs. LYB - Dividend Comparison

K's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than LYB's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
6.39%12.59%7.10%5.20%11.92%4.81%4.58%20.27%4.81%3.22%3.88%3.50%

Financials

K vs. LYB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and LyondellBasell Industries N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
3.26B
0
(K) Total Revenue
(LYB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


K and LYB have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K and LYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer