PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K vs. EL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K vs. EL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EL

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
-18.61%
6M
-17.07%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
-20.26%
5Y*
-21.07%
10Y*
0.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. EL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%
EL
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
-18.61%42.13%-47.59%-40.13%-32.31%40.03%29.77%60.34%3.38%68.68%

Correlation

The correlation between K and EL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 1995

0.25

The correlation between K and EL shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K:

$29.20B

EL:

$30.93B

EPS

K:

$3.65

EL:

-$0.68

PS Ratio

K:

2.30

EL:

2.07

PB Ratio

K:

6.95

EL:

7.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

K:

$12.67B

EL:

$14.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K:

$4.41B

EL:

$11.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

K:

$2.25B

EL:

$1.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K vs. EL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K

EL
EL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. EL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

K vs. EL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

Drawdowns

K vs. EL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.82%

Volatility

K vs. EL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.58%

Dividends

K vs. EL - Dividend Comparison

K has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
1.65%1.34%3.11%1.81%0.99%0.59%0.56%0.86%1.21%1.10%1.62%1.16%
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%

Financials

K vs. EL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kellogg Company and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
3.26B
3.71B
(K) Total Revenue
(EL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

K vs. EL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kellogg Company and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
33.3%
76.4%
Portfolio components
K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

EL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.84B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

EL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

EL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K and EL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K and EL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer