PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JXX vs. QLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JXX vs. QLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JXX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than QLC's 12.12% return.


JXX

1D
0.44%
1M
10.79%
YTD
18.71%
6M
17.45%
1Y
38.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLC

1D
0.66%
1M
5.15%
YTD
12.12%
6M
12.40%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JXX vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JXX and QLC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.80

The correlation between JXX and QLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JXX vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JXX
JXX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JXX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
JXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JXX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QLC
QLC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JXX vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JXXQLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.85

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

18.03

-11.04

JXX vs. QLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JXX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the QLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JXX and QLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JXXQLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.75

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.80

+0.14

Drawdowns

JXX vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JXX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JXX and QLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JXXQLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-35.86%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.02%

-8.84%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.09%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-4.54%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

1.89%

+3.65%

Volatility

JXX vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) at 2.89%. This indicates that JXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JXXQLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

2.89%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

9.52%

+6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

12.38%

+7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.28%

16.82%

+7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

18.42%

+5.86%

JXX vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JXX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JXX vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison

JXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QLC's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JXX
Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF
0.01%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
0.87%0.94%1.03%1.26%1.46%0.96%1.40%1.91%1.82%1.29%1.80%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


JXX and QLC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JXX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to QLC (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JXX dropped -23.73% vs QLC's -35.86%.

On 1-year performance, JXX leads with 38.60% vs 33.91% for QLC. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JXX has performed better with a 38.60% return vs 33.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for JXX.

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.01% for JXX.

JXX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for JXX and 0.25% for QLC.

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JXX and QLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer