PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JXX vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JXX vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JXX achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 32.24% return.


JXX

1D
1.84%
1M
5.66%
YTD
17.45%
6M
18.10%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
2.51%
1M
6.33%
YTD
32.24%
6M
31.51%
1Y
64.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JXX vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JXX and FMTM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.63

The correlation between JXX and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JXX vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JXX
JXX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
JXX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JXX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JXX vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JXXFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

5.38

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

20.55

-14.47

JXX vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JXX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JXX and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JXX vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JXX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JXX and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JXXFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-12.12%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.02%

-12.12%

-5.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

0.00%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-1.91%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

3.17%

+2.47%

Volatility

JXX vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF (JXX) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 8.53% and 8.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JXXFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

8.32%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

18.77%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

23.91%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

23.46%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.67%

23.46%

+1.21%

JXX vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JXX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JXX vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

JXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FMTM's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JXX and FMTM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JXX has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to FMTM (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JXX dropped -23.73% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 64.66% vs 34.99% for JXX. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 8.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 64.66% return vs 34.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for JXX.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.01% for JXX.

JXX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for JXX and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JXX and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer