PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVSIX vs. JGLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (JVSIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVSIX achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than JGLTX's 33.83% return. Over the past 10 years, JVSIX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


JVSIX

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.33%
YTD
10.80%
6M
12.55%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
9.07%

JGLTX

1D
3.12%
1M
18.98%
YTD
33.83%
6M
34.23%
1Y
60.12%
3Y*
36.59%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVSIX
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
10.80%4.45%16.28%15.25%-8.87%16.34%-3.09%26.95%-7.24%14.06%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
33.83%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JVSIX and JGLTX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between JVSIX and JGLTX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVSIX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVSIX
JVSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JVSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JVSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (JVSIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVSIXJGLTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

3.00

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.69

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.85

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.10

13.23

-6.13

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the JGLTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVSIX and JGLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVSIXJGLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

3.00

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.74

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.01

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.36

+0.20

Drawdowns

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVSIX drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVSIX and JGLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVSIXJGLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.82%

-81.78%

+41.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-15.81%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-23.72%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.11%

-45.18%

+17.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-45.18%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

0.00%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-36.60%

+31.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

4.60%

-0.80%

Volatility

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (JVSIX) is 4.72%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that JVSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVSIXJGLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

6.73%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

16.84%

-4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

20.52%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

26.10%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.81%

24.49%

-4.68%

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVSIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison

JVSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than JGLTX's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
6.71%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%
JVSIX
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
8.40%9.31%7.89%0.91%0.56%2.96%0.75%10.80%14.38%5.56%5.44%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JVSIX and JGLTX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGLTX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to JVSIX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVSIX dropped -39.82% vs JGLTX's -81.78%.

JGLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVSIX and JGLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer