JVSIX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (JVSIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JVSIX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 15, 2011. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVSIX Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.24% | 4.45% | 16.28% | 15.25% | -8.87% | 16.34% | -3.09% | 26.95% | -7.24% | 14.06% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVSIX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JVSIX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.70% annualized return.
JVSIX
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVSIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JVSIX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JVSIX
JGLTX
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (JVSIX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JVSIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.17 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.74 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.81 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 6.15 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JVSIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.17 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.85 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between JVSIX and JGLTX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JVSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, less than JGLTX's 9.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVSIX Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 9.11% | 9.31% | 7.89% | 0.91% | 0.56% | 2.96% | 0.75% | 10.80% | 14.38% | 5.56% | 5.44% | 6.93% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVSIX drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVSIX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVSIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.82% | -81.78% | +41.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.89% | -15.81% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.11% | -45.18% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | -45.18% | +5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -12.47% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -36.82% | +31.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 4.65% | -0.17% |
Volatility
JVSIX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (JVSIX) is 6.66%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that JVSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JVSIX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 8.22% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 16.11% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 25.28% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 25.93% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 24.31% | -4.60% |