PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVMIX vs. FVCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVMIX achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 27.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JVMIX having a 10.85% annualized return and FVCSX not far behind at 10.45%.


JVMIX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.11%
6M
8.96%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
10.85%
ALL TIME*
6.60%

FVCSX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.75%
6M
16.63%
YTD
27.96%
1Y
42.24%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
10.45%
ALL TIME*
6.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
14.27%11.28%10.46%16.64%-7.09%26.85%5.90%30.13%-14.90%15.10%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
27.96%7.23%-6.69%19.32%-8.35%31.94%7.10%33.09%-17.58%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JVMIX and FVCSX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1997

0.86

The correlation between JVMIX and FVCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVMIX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JVMIX
JVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FVCSX
FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JVMIXFVCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

4.05

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

15.61

-8.86

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVMIX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVMIX drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMIX and FVCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVMIXFVCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-70.38%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-9.89%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-37.07%

+15.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-37.07%

+15.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.64%

-48.07%

+5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-1.15%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-11.14%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.56%

+0.09%

Volatility

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) at 3.28%. This indicates that JVMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVMIXFVCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.28%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

11.74%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

16.95%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

20.96%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.22%

22.13%

-1.91%

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVMIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVMIX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

JVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than FVCSX's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
10.22%13.08%0.00%2.96%2.23%9.80%0.33%5.50%18.83%8.78%25.66%0.43%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.09%9.24%12.05%4.02%5.27%6.67%1.13%2.40%13.85%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JVMIX and FVCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JVMIX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to FVCSX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVMIX dropped -67.04% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVMIX and FVCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer