PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JVMIX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVMIX achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, JVMIX has underperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


JVMIX

1D
0.89%
1M
1.31%
YTD
7.14%
6M
5.90%
1Y
15.95%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.34%

FSLSX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.49%
YTD
21.04%
6M
13.49%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
7.14%11.28%10.46%16.64%-7.09%26.85%5.90%30.13%-14.90%15.10%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
21.04%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between JVMIX and FSLSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1997

0.91

The correlation between JVMIX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JVMIX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVMIX
JVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JVMIXFSLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.32

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

10.82

-4.40

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVMIX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JVMIXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.73

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.45

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.54

-0.23

Drawdowns

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVMIX drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVMIX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JVMIXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-69.87%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-9.79%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-26.81%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-26.81%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.64%

-47.98%

+5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

0.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-8.28%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.99%

-0.33%

Volatility

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) is 3.27%, while Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that JVMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JVMIXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

4.27%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

14.50%

-5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

18.78%

-6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

20.50%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

21.92%

-1.60%

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVMIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

JVMIX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

JVMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.63%9.24%12.05%4.02%5.27%6.67%1.13%2.40%13.85%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JVMIX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to JVMIX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVMIX dropped -67.04% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

FSLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JVMIX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer