JVAL vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. JVAL is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JVAL returned 22.05%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

JVAL vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 11.89% return.

JVAL

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 8.75%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 6M: 19.72%
• 1Y: 39.93%
• 3Y*: 22.05%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JVAL vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF	19.44%	16.16%	14.53%	19.48%	-4.71%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.89%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JVAL and CGDV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.92

The correlation between JVAL and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JVAL vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JVAL	CGDV
Technology	39.2%	34.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	10.6%
Financial Services	9.3%	6.8%
Healthcare	8.2%	11.5%
Industrials	7.4%	13.2%
Communication Services	6.9%	8.4%
Energy	3.5%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	5.5%
Real Estate	2.6%	1.1%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.9%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%

Return for Risk

JVAL vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JVAL

JVAL Risk / Return Rank: 86
JVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
JVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
JVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JVAL vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JVAL	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	2.68	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.99	3.69	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.50	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.73	3.18	+1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.70	15.06	+3.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JVAL vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVAL and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JVAL	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	2.68	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	1.24	-0.57

Drawdowns

JVAL vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JVAL	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-21.82%	-18.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-9.75%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	-14.28%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.55%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-3.62%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.06%	+0.08%

Volatility

JVAL vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JVAL	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	3.09%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.08%	9.13%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.79%	11.59%	+2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	15.48%	+1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.82%	15.48%	+4.34%

JVAL vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

JVAL vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF	1.72%	2.08%	2.21%	2.43%	2.46%	1.88%	2.55%	2.58%	2.61%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JVAL and CGDV in my portfolio?

JVAL and CGDV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JVAL or CGDV?

JVAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, JVAL or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.14% vs 22.05% for JVAL. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JVAL or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 22.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JVAL or CGDV?

JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JVAL or CGDV?

JVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between JVAL and CGDV?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.