PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUST vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUST vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 10.69% return.


JUST

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUST vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.64%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%19.59%31.54%-9.62%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-8.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JUST and VV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.98

The correlation between JUST and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUST vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUST
VV

Technology

35.8%
35.9%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.8%

Communication Services

9.3%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.6%

Technology

JUST
35.8%
VV
35.9%

Financial Services

JUST
12.5%
VV
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JUST
9.8%
VV
9.8%

Communication Services

JUST
9.3%
VV
11.2%

Healthcare

JUST
8.6%
VV
8.6%

Industrials

JUST
8.6%
VV
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

JUST
5.5%
VV
4.8%

Energy

JUST
3.6%
VV
3.6%

Utilities

JUST
2.2%
VV
2.7%

Real Estate

JUST
2.2%
VV
1.7%

Basic Materials

JUST
2.2%
VV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUST vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUST vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUSTVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.03

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

13.86

+1.63

JUST vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUST Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUST and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUSTVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.33

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.79

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

JUST vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSTVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-54.81%

+20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-9.21%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-18.97%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-25.66%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.72%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-6.84%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.01%

-0.13%

Volatility

JUST vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSTVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.84%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.98%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

11.99%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.22%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.19%

+0.93%

JUST vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JUST vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JUST and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JUST has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.54% vs 13.24% for JUST. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 13.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUST.

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.93% for JUST.

JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.04% for VV.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUST and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer