JUSA vs. BUFX
JUSA (JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUSA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
JUSA vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUSA achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.65% return.
JUSA
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUSA vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF | 7.68% | 12.69% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 3.65% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUSA and BUFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUSA vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
JUSA
BUFX
JUSA vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUSA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUSA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 2.51 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
JUSA vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUSA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -2.87% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -0.59% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -0.24% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility
JUSA vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUSA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 4.02% | +8.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 4.02% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 4.02% | +14.77% |
JUSA vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUSA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUSA vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
JUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JUSA JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JUSA and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JUSA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JUSA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
JUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
JUSA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUSA and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for JUSA and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer