JUNZ vs. ZMAR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR).

JUNZ and ZMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JUNZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It was launched on May 28, 2021. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025.

Performance

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	-4.52%	13.36%
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	0.33%	5.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNZ achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly lower than ZMAR's 0.33% return.

JUNZ

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: -4.55%
• YTD: -4.52%
• 6M: -2.89%
• 1Y: 11.68%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMAR

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 7.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JUNZ and ZMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

JUNZ

TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF

ZMAR

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March

Return for Risk

JUNZ vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNZ

JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 51
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

ZMAR

ZMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNZ	ZMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.28	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	3.60	-2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.54	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	3.79	-2.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.67	19.05	-13.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the ZMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNZ and ZMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNZ	ZMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	2.28	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.83	-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between JUNZ and ZMAR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison

JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while ZMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JUNZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF	2.41%	2.30%	3.97%	6.03%	0.56%	0.32%
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than ZMAR's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and ZMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNZ	ZMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-2.30%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-1.92%	-6.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.28%	-0.77%	-5.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-0.25%	-4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	0.38%	+1.75%

Volatility

JUNZ vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) at 1.19%. This indicates that JUNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUNZ	ZMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	1.19%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	1.67%	+6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.45%	3.11%	+10.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	3.21%	+8.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	3.21%	+8.57%