PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUNZ vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
-3.86%12.83%17.32%17.28%-12.97%9.81%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
2.56%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%-4.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNZ achieves a -3.86% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 2.56% return.


JUNZ

1D
0.69%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-3.86%
6M
-2.38%
1Y
11.94%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
10Y*

EAPR

1D
1.94%
1M
1.25%
YTD
2.56%
6M
4.21%
1Y
14.77%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JUNZ vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JUNZ vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNZ
JUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
JUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUNZEAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.87

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

2.77

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.54

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.11

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.78

15.78

-10.01

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNZ and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUNZEAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.87

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.40

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between JUNZ and EAPR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

JUNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
JUNZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF
2.39%2.30%3.97%6.03%0.56%0.32%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNZ drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNZ and EAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JUNZEAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-17.65%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-6.99%

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

0.00%

-5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-4.18%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

0.94%

+1.22%

Volatility

JUNZ vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (June) ETF (JUNZ) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 2.28%. This indicates that JUNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JUNZEAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

2.28%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

3.08%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

7.95%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

9.85%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.78%

9.85%

+1.93%