JULZ vs. HEQT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JULZ (Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF) and HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JULZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while HEQT is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Simplify. JULZ is passively managed, while HEQT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JULZ returned 15.38%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for HEQT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JULZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for HEQT.

Performance

JULZ vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULZ achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than HEQT's 4.02% return.

JULZ

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 18.08%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: —

HEQT

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULZ vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	6.03%	13.23%	18.76%	17.65%	-9.34%	2.51%
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	4.02%	10.08%	18.30%	16.61%	-8.25%	2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between JULZ and HEQT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021	0.91

The correlation between JULZ and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JULZ vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULZ

JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 52
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

HEQT

HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 63
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULZ vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JULZ	HEQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.97	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.77	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.56	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.01	11.59	-2.58

JULZ vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULZ and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JULZ vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULZ drawdown since its inception was -14.71%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULZ and HEQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULZ	HEQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.71%	-11.51%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-5.09%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	-10.57%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.04%	-1.12%	-1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-2.77%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.12%	+0.89%

Volatility

JULZ vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 2.06%. This indicates that JULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULZ	HEQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	2.06%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.78%	5.49%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	6.64%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.29%	8.47%	+3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.36%	8.47%	+3.89%

JULZ vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

JULZ vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

JULZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than HEQT's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	1.20%	1.19%	1.29%	4.10%	3.94%	0.27%
JULZ Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF	11.28%	11.96%	3.30%	3.59%	0.07%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JULZ and HEQT in my portfolio?

JULZ and HEQT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JULZ or HEQT?

JULZ has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to HEQT (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULZ dropped -14.71% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

Which ETF is better, JULZ or HEQT?

On 3-year performance, JULZ leads with 15.38% vs 12.95% for HEQT. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JULZ or HEQT?

Over the 3-year period, JULZ has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JULZ or HEQT?

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JULZ or HEQT?

JULZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.28%, compared with 1.20% for HEQT.

What is the main difference between JULZ and HEQT?

JULZ is categorized as Options Trading, while HEQT is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULZ and 0.43% for HEQT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.