PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULT vs. SIXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JULT vs. SIXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JULT vs. SIXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
-2.04%13.73%17.43%21.34%-6.01%
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
-1.87%12.81%14.48%18.07%-10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULT achieves a -2.04% return, which is significantly lower than SIXJ's -1.87% return.


JULT

1D
2.00%
1M
-2.85%
YTD
-2.04%
6M
0.19%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*

SIXJ

1D
1.64%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-1.87%
6M
0.90%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JULT vs. SIXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JULT and SIXJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

JULT vs. SIXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULT
JULT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXJ
SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULT vs. SIXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JULTSIXJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.82

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.64

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.67

9.73

-0.06

JULT vs. SIXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULT Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the SIXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULT and SIXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULTSIXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.70

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between JULT and SIXJ is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JULT vs. SIXJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULT nor SIXJ has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.86%
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JULT vs. SIXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULT drawdown since its inception was -13.57%, roughly equal to the maximum SIXJ drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULT and SIXJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JULTSIXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-14.07%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-7.68%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-2.97%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-2.98%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.29%

+0.30%

Volatility

JULT vs. SIXJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) at 3.17%. This indicates that JULT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JULTSIXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.17%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.63%

4.58%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

10.34%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

10.17%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

10.17%

+0.43%