JULJ vs. KLIP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).

JULJ and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JULJ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2023. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.

Performance

JULJ vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JULJ vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	0.80%	5.91%	6.17%	3.54%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-9.58%	16.92%	3.37%	11.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULJ achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -9.58% return.

JULJ

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLIP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: -9.58%
• 6M: -13.65%
• 1Y: -2.20%
• 3Y*: 7.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULJ vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.

KLIP

KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF

JULJ

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July

Return for Risk

JULJ vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULJ

JULJ Risk / Return Rank: 77
JULJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
JULJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
JULJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JULJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JULJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 9
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULJ vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JULJ	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	-0.11	+1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	-0.02	+2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.00	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	-0.12	+1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.70	-0.39	+16.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JULJ vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULJ and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JULJ	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	-0.11	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.91	0.34	+1.57

Correlation

The correlation between JULJ and KLIP is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

JULJ vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, less than KLIP's 28.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July	5.72%	5.76%	5.96%	3.21%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	28.43%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%

Drawdowns

JULJ vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULJ drawdown since its inception was -3.62%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULJ and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JULJ	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.62%	-18.61%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.62%	-16.55%	+12.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.77%	+14.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-3.37%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	5.34%	-4.98%

Volatility

JULJ vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) is 0.68%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that JULJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JULJ	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	6.66%	-5.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.27%	13.48%	-12.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40%	19.76%	-15.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.16%	18.17%	-15.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.16%	18.17%	-15.01%