PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULH vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULH vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULH achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 4.76% return.


JULH

1D
0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.40%
6M
0.84%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQT

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
4.76%
6M
4.67%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULH vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
2.40%5.39%6.93%4.51%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.76%10.08%18.30%5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JULH and HEQT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023

0.73

The correlation between JULH and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULH vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULH
JULH Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JULH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULH Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
JULH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULH Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULH vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JULHHEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.76

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

12.50

-4.99

JULH vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULH Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULH and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JULH vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULH drawdown since its inception was -5.51%, smaller than the maximum HEQT drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULH and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULHHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-11.51%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-5.09%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-2.77%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.12%

-0.44%

Volatility

JULH vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) is 0.09%, while Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that JULH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULHHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

1.92%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

5.47%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

6.61%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.72%

8.47%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

8.47%

-3.75%

JULH vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULH vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

JULH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than HEQT's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.20%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
5.27%5.31%6.89%3.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JULH and HEQT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEQT has higher volatility (1.92%) compared to JULH (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULH dropped -5.51% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 14.00% vs 5.09% for JULH. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, JULH has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULH.

JULH has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 1.20% for HEQT.

JULH is categorized as Options Trading, while HEQT is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JULH and 0.43% for HEQT.

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULH and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer