PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JUKE.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUKE.L achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.


JUKE.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.07%
YTD
6.30%
6M
8.40%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
10Y*

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JUKE.L
JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist)
6.30%25.12%9.70%7.50%5.81%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between JUKE.L and FLXD.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

0.66

The correlation between JUKE.L and FLXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUKE.L
JUKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JUKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JUKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUKE.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

5.64

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

15.75

-7.74

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUKE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUKE.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUKE.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.40

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.64

+0.51

Drawdowns

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUKE.L drawdown since its inception was -12.31%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUKE.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUKE.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-29.71%

+17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-3.62%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-7.78%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-2.77%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-4.13%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.30%

+1.29%

Volatility

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that JUKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUKE.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.67%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

6.95%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

8.52%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

10.85%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.88%

12.91%

-1.03%

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JUKE.L and FLXD.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JUKE.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

JUKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than FLXD.L's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%
JUKE.L
JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist)
2.86%2.79%3.11%2.94%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JUKE.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JUKE.L and FLXD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

JUKE.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUKE.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer