JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JUKE.L (JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist)) and BBDD.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JUKE.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while BBDD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JUKE.L returned 14.96%/yr vs 19.09%/yr for BBDD.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JUKE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBDD.L.

Performance

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUKE.L achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than BBDD.L's 10.30% return.

JUKE.L

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 6M: 8.40%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBDD.L

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 10.10%
• 1Y: 28.61%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JUKE.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist)	6.30%	25.12%	9.70%	7.50%	5.81%
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)	10.30%	9.41%	27.20%	20.72%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between JUKE.L and BBDD.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.46

Return for Risk

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUKE.L

JUKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
JUKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
JUKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JUKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JUKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
JUKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BBDD.L

BBDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BBDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BBDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BBDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUKE.L	BBDD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.69	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.60	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.50	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.66	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.01	12.78	-4.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUKE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUKE.L and BBDD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUKE.L	BBDD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.69	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.96	+0.19

Drawdowns

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUKE.L drawdown since its inception was -12.31%, smaller than the maximum BBDD.L drawdown of -25.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUKE.L and BBDD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUKE.L	BBDD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.31%	-25.72%	+13.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-7.78%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.31%	-21.41%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.53%	-0.16%	-3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-3.72%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.23%	+0.36%

Volatility

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that JUKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUKE.L	BBDD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	2.63%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	7.24%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	10.57%	+0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.88%	14.47%	-2.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.88%	16.17%	-4.29%

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUKE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBDD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JUKE.L vs. BBDD.L - Dividend Comparison

JUKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than BBDD.L's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)	0.99%	1.12%	0.99%	1.31%	1.44%	0.94%	1.46%	0.79%
JUKE.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist)	2.86%	2.79%	3.11%	2.94%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUKE.L and BBDD.L in my portfolio?

JUKE.L and BBDD.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JUKE.L or BBDD.L?

On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUKE.L or BBDD.L?

BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JUKE.L.

What is the main difference between JUKE.L and BBDD.L?

JUKE.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BBDD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. JUKE.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while BBDD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JUKE.L and 0.05% for BBDD.L.