PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUESX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUESX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan US Equity Fund Class I (JUESX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUESX achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than FZALX's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, JUESX has underperformed FZALX with an annualized return of 15.16%, while FZALX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.


JUESX

1D
1.77%
1M
-1.36%
6M
2.45%
YTD
2.98%
1Y
10.50%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
15.16%
ALL TIME*
7.49%

FZALX

1D
2.14%
1M
0.20%
6M
7.48%
YTD
10.77%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
16.39%
ALL TIME*
14.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JUESX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JUESX
JPMorgan US Equity Fund Class I
2.98%14.39%31.07%27.06%-18.95%28.33%26.17%32.02%-6.01%21.40%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
10.77%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between JUESX and FZALX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.93

The correlation between JUESX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUESX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JUESX
JUESX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
JUESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUESX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
JUESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JUESX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan US Equity Fund Class I (JUESX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JUESXFZALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.38

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

10.28

-7.53

JUESX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUESX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JUESX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUESX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUESX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUESXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.74%

-35.23%

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-8.99%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-18.49%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.69%

-23.25%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-35.23%

+1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-1.41%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-3.75%

-8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.08%

+1.05%

Volatility

JUESX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan US Equity Fund Class I (JUESX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) have volatilities of 3.69% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUESXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.63%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

9.97%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

12.86%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

16.72%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

18.10%

+0.46%

JUESX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUESX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

JUESX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

JUESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than FZALX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.64%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%
JUESX
JPMorgan US Equity Fund Class I
5.54%5.73%11.92%1.94%4.97%10.64%6.38%9.92%14.45%8.60%4.64%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JUESX and FZALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JUESX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to FZALX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUESX dropped -58.74% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUESX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer