PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JTSSX vs. FFBQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JTSSX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than FFBQX's 14.03% return.


JTSSX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.35%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.44%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
10.94%

FFBQX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.03%
6M
15.51%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
9.88%17.88%12.31%22.36%-18.58%17.53%15.33%8.06%
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
14.03%22.90%16.84%20.67%-18.86%16.47%18.10%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JTSSX and FFBQX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.97

The correlation between JTSSX and FFBQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JTSSX vs. FFBQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JTSSX
JTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FFBQX
FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JTSSXFFBQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

2.50

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

3.45

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.28

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.29

14.54

-3.26

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FFBQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JTSSX and FFBQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JTSSXFFBQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.50

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.73

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.79

-0.32

Drawdowns

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JTSSX drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than FFBQX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JTSSX and FFBQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JTSSXFFBQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-31.34%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-9.67%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-15.51%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-27.60%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-5.97%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

2.17%

-0.09%

Volatility

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) is 3.49%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that JTSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFBQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JTSSXFFBQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

4.18%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

10.39%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

12.67%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

15.10%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.25%

-1.53%

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JTSSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFBQX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JTSSX vs. FFBQX - Dividend Comparison

JTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FFBQX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
3.32%2.58%5.66%2.07%5.40%6.98%3.62%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
4.69%5.16%2.58%1.57%10.75%16.31%4.46%9.76%5.08%3.84%2.97%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JTSSX and FFBQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFBQX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to JTSSX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JTSSX dropped -50.11% vs FFBQX's -31.34%.

FFBQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JTSSX and FFBQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer