JSTC vs. GVAL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JSTC (Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSTC returned 6.37%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for GVAL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JSTC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.

Performance

JSTC vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSTC achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 17.40% return.

JSTC

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 9.87%
• 1Y: 17.39%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —

GVAL

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 43.62%
• 3Y*: 27.44%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSTC vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JSTC Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF	10.39%	12.02%	8.96%	15.67%	-17.58%	19.28%	2.48%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	17.40%	55.87%	2.59%	13.30%	-7.98%	10.70%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JSTC and GVAL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020	0.69

The correlation between JSTC and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSTC vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JSTC	GVAL
Technology	35.4%	9.4%
Financial Services	22.2%	16.9%
Industrials	15.1%	3.6%
Healthcare	9.2%	-
Communication Services	8.1%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	1.8%
Utilities	1.6%	3.7%
Basic Materials	0.9%	7.7%
Real Estate	0.4%	6.2%
Energy	0.0%	6.8%

Return for Risk

JSTC vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSTC

JSTC Risk / Return Rank: 39
JSTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
JSTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JSTC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JSTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
JSTC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSTC vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JSTC	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.82	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	3.72	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.50	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	3.81	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.11	14.52	-7.40

JSTC vs. GVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the GVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSTC and GVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JSTC vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSTC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSTC and GVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JSTC	GVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-46.82%	+20.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-11.50%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.72%	-15.72%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	-30.83%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-2.31%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-13.82%	+7.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	3.01%	-0.56%

Volatility

JSTC vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) is 5.11%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that JSTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JSTC	GVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	6.37%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	13.81%	-2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.93%	15.55%	-1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	18.60%	-2.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.80%	19.00%	-3.20%

JSTC vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSTC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

JSTC vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

JSTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than GVAL's 2.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.43%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%
JSTC Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF	1.22%	1.34%	1.11%	1.03%	0.83%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JSTC and GVAL in my portfolio?

JSTC and GVAL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JSTC or GVAL?

GVAL has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to JSTC (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSTC dropped -26.82% vs GVAL's -46.82%.

Which ETF is better, JSTC or GVAL?

On 5-year performance, GVAL leads with 14.14% vs 6.37% for JSTC. On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, JSTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JSTC or GVAL?

Over the 5-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JSTC or GVAL?

GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for JSTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JSTC or GVAL?

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.22% for JSTC.

What is the main difference between JSTC and GVAL?

They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for JSTC and 0.64% for GVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.