JSNIX vs. TAGRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JSNIX (JHancock Short Duration Bond Fund) and TAGRX (John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - JSNIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by John Hancock, while TAGRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 5 years, JSNIX returned 2.32%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for TAGRX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JSNIX charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TAGRX.

Performance

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JHancock Short Duration Bond Fund (JSNIX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSNIX achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's 0.70% return.

JSNIX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 4.90%
• 5Y*: 2.32%
• 10Y*: —

TAGRX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 12.89%
• 3Y*: 14.17%
• 5Y*: 8.21%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JSNIX JHancock Short Duration Bond Fund	0.76%	5.97%	4.61%	4.80%	-4.46%	0.78%	4.22%	1.41%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	0.70%	9.98%	21.14%	32.23%	-24.86%	29.16%	20.55%	7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JSNIX and TAGRX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019	0.22

The correlation between JSNIX and TAGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JSNIX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSNIX

JSNIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
JSNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JSNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
JSNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
JSNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JSNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

TAGRX

TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 12
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Short Duration Bond Fund (JSNIX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JSNIX	TAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	0.97	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.23	1.37	+2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.18	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	0.91	+2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.75	3.14	+9.61

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the TAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSNIX and TAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSNIX drawdown since its inception was -7.23%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSNIX and TAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JSNIX	TAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.23%	-58.45%	+51.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.38%	-14.04%	+12.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.38%	-26.11%	+24.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.01%	-29.10%	+22.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-3.29%	+3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-11.53%	+10.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	4.05%	-3.72%

Volatility

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JHancock Short Duration Bond Fund (JSNIX) is 0.65%, while John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that JSNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JSNIX	TAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	4.97%	-4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.53%	10.42%	-8.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04%	13.12%	-11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.29%	20.26%	-17.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	20.53%	-18.15%

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSNIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

JSNIX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison

JSNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than TAGRX's 12.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JSNIX JHancock Short Duration Bond Fund	4.91%	4.92%	4.17%	3.46%	3.03%	2.49%	2.99%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	12.01%	12.09%	13.00%	6.67%	6.76%	7.82%	0.30%	0.53%	14.05%	8.22%	2.96%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JSNIX and TAGRX in my portfolio?

JSNIX and TAGRX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JSNIX or TAGRX?

TAGRX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to JSNIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSNIX dropped -7.23% vs TAGRX's -58.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JSNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.