PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMSX vs. URTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMSX achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than URTRX's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMSX has outperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.01% annualized return.


JSMSX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.73%
YTD
6.37%
6M
6.66%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
9.87%

URTRX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.32%
YTD
8.16%
6M
8.62%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund
6.37%14.15%6.89%18.54%-16.76%10.72%12.45%41.23%-7.64%18.74%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
8.16%14.78%8.09%13.98%-13.23%12.23%9.25%17.13%-6.98%16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMSX and URTRX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008

0.97

The correlation between JSMSX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMSX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMSX
JSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSMSXURTRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.54

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

3.67

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.44

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.44

14.88

-3.44

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMSX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSMSXURTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.54

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.68

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.78

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.61

-0.11

Drawdowns

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMSX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than URTRX's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMSX and URTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMSXURTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.05%

-34.10%

-15.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-5.29%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.53%

-9.12%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-19.52%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-23.56%

-1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-4.15%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

1.22%

+0.26%

Volatility

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMSXURTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.54%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

5.81%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72%

7.15%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

9.69%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.45%

10.35%

+2.10%

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JSMSX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

JSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than URTRX's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSMSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund
5.50%5.85%5.49%2.50%8.25%12.28%4.20%31.61%6.17%4.18%2.83%3.20%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.27%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JSMSX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSMSX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to URTRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMSX dropped -50.05% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMSX and URTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer