PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMSX vs. JLGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMSX achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than JLGMX's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMSX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.16% annualized return.


JSMSX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.73%
YTD
6.37%
6M
6.66%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
9.87%

JLGMX

1D
0.66%
1M
6.71%
YTD
7.96%
6M
6.63%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
20.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund
6.37%14.15%6.89%18.54%-16.76%10.72%12.45%41.23%-7.64%18.74%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
7.96%14.38%35.40%34.95%-25.20%18.48%56.39%39.47%0.74%38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMSX and JLGMX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

0.85

The correlation between JSMSX and JLGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMSX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMSX
JSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JLGMX
JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSMSXJLGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.34

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

3.82

+7.62

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMSX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSMSXJLGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.44

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.70

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.94

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Drawdowns

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMSX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMSX and JLGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMSXJLGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.05%

-31.82%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-16.73%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.53%

-21.47%

+11.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-31.13%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-31.82%

+6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-5.81%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

5.85%

-4.37%

Volatility

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) is 2.59%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that JSMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMSXJLGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.87%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

11.22%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72%

15.60%

-7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

20.18%

-9.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.45%

21.57%

-9.12%

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMSX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

JSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than JLGMX's 10.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
10.23%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%
JSMSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund
5.50%5.85%5.49%2.50%8.25%12.28%4.20%31.61%6.17%4.18%2.83%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMSX and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGMX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JSMSX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMSX dropped -50.05% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

JSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMSX and JLGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer