PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMSX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMSX achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 1,464,383.96% return.


JSMSX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6.22%
6M
5.81%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
10.14%

FRHMX

1D
1,410,365.12%
1M
1,421,616.96%
YTD
1,464,383.96%
6M
1,464,432.61%
1Y
1,543,480.72%
3Y*
2,494.75%
5Y*
596.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JSMSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund
6.22%14.15%6.89%18.54%-16.76%10.72%12.45%24.13%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
1,464,383.96%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.79%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMSX and FRHMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.79

The correlation between JSMSX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMSX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMSX
JSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMSXFRHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-488,364.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

68,097.73

-68,096.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

470,348.34

-470,345.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

1,985,653.35

-1,985,642.54

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMSX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMSX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMSX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMSXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.05%

-15.96%

-34.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-3.42%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.53%

-4.90%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.56%

-15.96%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-3.49%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

0.81%

+0.69%

Volatility

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund (JSMSX) is 3.16%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a volatility of 955.41%. This indicates that JSMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMSXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

955.41%

-952.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

955.40%

-948.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.20%

1,413,171.78%

-1,413,163.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

631,989.64%

-631,979.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

538,904.02%

-538,891.55%

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JSMSX and FRHMX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JSMSX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

JSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than FRHMX's 103.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
103.07%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSMSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 Fund
5.51%5.85%5.49%2.50%8.25%12.28%4.20%31.61%6.17%4.18%2.83%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMSX and FRHMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRHMX has higher volatility (955.41%) compared to JSMSX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMSX dropped -50.05% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

JSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMSX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer