PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. RWK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JSMD having a 16.93% return and RWK slightly lower at 16.44%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JSMD having a 12.94% annualized return and RWK not far behind at 12.69%.


JSMD

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.82%
6M
9.06%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
12.94%
ALL TIME*
14.08%

RWK

1D
-0.93%
1M
1.82%
6M
10.32%
YTD
16.44%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
12.69%
ALL TIME*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
16.93%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
16.44%10.27%11.94%23.76%-8.19%34.31%11.06%28.20%-14.65%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and RWK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.81

The correlation between JSMD and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
RWK

Technology

27.7%
11.8%

Industrials

22.1%
23.3%

Healthcare

20.3%
4.7%

Financial Services

9.3%
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
21.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
11.1%

Energy

1.0%
4.9%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Technology

JSMD
27.7%
RWK
11.8%

Industrials

JSMD
22.1%
RWK
23.3%

Healthcare

JSMD
20.3%
RWK
4.7%

Financial Services

JSMD
9.3%
RWK
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
9.0%
RWK
21.0%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.9%
RWK
2.9%

Communication Services

JSMD
2.7%
RWK
1.4%

Basic Materials

JSMD
2.6%
RWK
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
2.4%
RWK
11.1%

Energy

JSMD
1.0%
RWK
4.9%

Utilities

JSMD

-

RWK
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

RWK
RWK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDRWKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.03

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

6.54

-1.65

JSMD vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and RWK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDRWKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-56.49%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-11.14%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-24.58%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-24.58%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

-46.20%

+7.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-1.68%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-7.51%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

3.45%

+1.03%

Volatility

JSMD vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 3.12%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDRWKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

3.12%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.45%

11.96%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.19%

16.49%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.07%

20.94%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

22.88%

-0.07%

JSMD vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RWK's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
1.02%1.25%1.11%1.05%1.18%0.85%0.96%1.09%1.22%0.99%1.30%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and RWK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to RWK (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs RWK's -56.49%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 12.94% vs 12.69% for RWK. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, RWK has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

RWK has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.39% for RWK.

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and RWK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer