PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. QQQJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQJ's 21.27% return.


JSMD

1D
2.28%
1M
-3.09%
6M
10.51%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
13.97%

QQQJ

1D
1.46%
1M
-1.78%
6M
15.74%
YTD
21.27%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.51M$7.19M$7.86M
$4.93M$6.31M$6.15M

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
16.38%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%11.42%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
21.27%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and QQQJ is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.89

The correlation between JSMD and QQQJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
QQQJ

Technology

27.7%
34.2%

Industrials

22.1%
13.6%

Healthcare

20.3%
23.3%

Financial Services

9.3%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
11.8%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
5.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.9%

Energy

1.0%
1.1%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Technology

JSMD
27.7%
QQQJ
34.2%

Industrials

JSMD
22.1%
QQQJ
13.6%

Healthcare

JSMD
20.3%
QQQJ
23.3%

Financial Services

JSMD
9.3%
QQQJ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
9.0%
QQQJ
11.8%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.9%
QQQJ

-

Communication Services

JSMD
2.7%
QQQJ
5.9%

Basic Materials

JSMD
2.6%
QQQJ
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
2.4%
QQQJ
2.9%

Energy

JSMD
1.0%
QQQJ
1.1%

Utilities

JSMD

-

QQQJ
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDQQQJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.06

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

12.04

-7.31

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the QQQJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and QQQJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQJ drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and QQQJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDQQQJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-39.57%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-11.84%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-22.46%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-39.57%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-2.26%

-4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-15.37%

+7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

3.01%

+1.68%

Volatility

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) at 3.85%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDQQQJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

3.85%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.87%

15.45%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

19.21%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.15%

22.16%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

21.97%

+0.90%

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQJ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than QQQJ's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.55%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and QQQJ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to QQQJ (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs QQQJ's -39.57%.

On 5-year performance, JSMD leads with 7.42% vs 6.33% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 7.42% return vs 6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.15% for QQQJ.

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and QQQJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer