JSMD vs. QQQ
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSMD returned 13.87%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
JSMD vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.87%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
JSMD
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
JSMD vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.16% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and QQQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between JSMD and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
QQQ
Industrials
JSMD
QQQ
Healthcare
JSMD
QQQ
Financial Services
JSMD
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
QQQ
Basic Materials
JSMD
QQQ
Communication Services
JSMD
QQQ
Real Estate
JSMD
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
QQQ
Energy
JSMD
QQQ
Utilities
JSMD
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
QQQ
JSMD vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSMD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.93 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 10.86 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -82.97% | +43.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -11.96% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -22.77% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -35.12% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | -35.12% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -4.25% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -32.73% | +25.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 3.22% | +1.17% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) is 7.47%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that JSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 9.17% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 14.57% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 17.96% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 22.69% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 22.42% | +0.41% |
JSMD vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and QQQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to JSMD (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 13.87% for JSMD. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JSMD has been the lower-risk option at 7.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer