PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. PULS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 1.73% return.


JSMD

1D
0.70%
1M
1.65%
YTD
15.35%
6M
12.87%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
13.27%

PULS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.05%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.58%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
15.35%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-7.62%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
1.73%4.97%6.12%6.26%1.52%0.48%1.47%2.97%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and PULS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018

0.08

The correlation between JSMD and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JSMD vs. PULS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
PULS

Technology

24.9%

-

Industrials

22.8%

-

Healthcare

18.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Financial Services

8.9%
1.5%

Communication Services

3.3%

-

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.8%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JSMD
24.9%
PULS

-

Industrials

JSMD
22.8%
PULS

-

Healthcare

JSMD
18.7%
PULS

-

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
9.8%
PULS

-

Financial Services

JSMD
8.9%
PULS
1.5%

Communication Services

JSMD
3.3%
PULS

-

Real Estate

JSMD
2.8%
PULS

-

Basic Materials

JSMD
2.6%
PULS

-

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
1.8%
PULS

-

Energy

JSMD
1.6%
PULS

-

Utilities

JSMD

-

PULS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PULS
PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JSMDPULSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-31.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

7.53

-6.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

52.00

-50.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

314.53

-309.15

JSMD vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JSMDPULSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

11.31

-10.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

5.92

-5.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

2.51

-1.88

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and PULS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDPULSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-5.85%

-33.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-0.09%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-0.34%

-23.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-0.79%

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-0.02%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-0.09%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

0.01%

+4.40%

Volatility

JSMD vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDPULSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

0.11%

+7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

0.30%

+16.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

0.41%

+21.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

0.70%

+22.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

1.33%

+21.47%

JSMD vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than PULS's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.48%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.58%4.78%5.62%5.48%2.30%1.19%1.85%2.69%1.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JSMD and PULS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs PULS's -5.85%.

On 5-year performance, JSMD leads with 7.35% vs 4.12% for PULS. On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PULS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.48% for JSMD.

JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.15% for PULS.

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.31 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and PULS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer