JSMD vs. PGHY
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSMD returned 13.27%/yr vs 4.32%/yr for PGHY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PGHY.
Performance
JSMD vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than PGHY's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has outperformed PGHY with an annualized return of 13.27%, while PGHY has yielded a comparatively lower 4.32% annualized return.
JSMD
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
JSMD vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 15.35% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 3.04% | 5.87% | 0.38% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and PGHY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016 | 0.30 |
JSMD vs. PGHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
PGHY
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
PGHY
Industrials
JSMD
PGHY
Healthcare
JSMD
PGHY
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
PGHY
Financial Services
JSMD
PGHY
Communication Services
JSMD
PGHY
Real Estate
JSMD
PGHY
Basic Materials
JSMD
PGHY
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
PGHY
Energy
JSMD
PGHY
Utilities
JSMD
-
PGHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
PGHY
JSMD vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSMD | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.48 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 9.56 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSMD | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.49 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.83 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.60 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than PGHY's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and PGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -20.50% | -18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -3.04% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -5.03% | -18.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -9.42% | -22.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | -20.50% | -18.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -0.80% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -1.64% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 0.79% | +3.62% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) at 2.00%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 2.00% | +5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 3.73% | +13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 5.06% | +17.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 5.45% | +17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 7.04% | +15.76% |
JSMD vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PGHY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than PGHY's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.48% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and PGHY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs PGHY's -20.50%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.27% vs 4.32% for PGHY. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 0.48% for JSMD.
JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PGHY is High Yield Bonds. JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and PGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer