JSMD vs. MDYG
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - JSMD tracks the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index while MDYG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSMD returned 13.87%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for MDYG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MDYG.
Performance
JSMD vs. MDYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JSMD having a 19.16% return and MDYG slightly lower at 18.55%. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has outperformed MDYG with an annualized return of 13.87%, while MDYG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.88% annualized return.
JSMD
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
MDYG
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
JSMD vs. MDYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.16% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 18.55% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and MDYG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JSMD and MDYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. MDYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
MDYG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
MDYG
Industrials
JSMD
MDYG
Healthcare
JSMD
MDYG
Financial Services
JSMD
MDYG
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
MDYG
Basic Materials
JSMD
MDYG
Communication Services
JSMD
MDYG
Real Estate
JSMD
MDYG
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
MDYG
Energy
JSMD
MDYG
Utilities
JSMD
-
MDYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. MDYG — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
MDYG
JSMD vs. MDYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSMD | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.98 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 11.83 | -5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. MDYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum MDYG drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and MDYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -58.44% | +19.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -9.91% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -25.45% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -29.26% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | -39.27% | +0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.57% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -8.01% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 2.49% | +1.90% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. MDYG - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) at 5.90%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 5.90% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 13.90% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 17.63% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 20.71% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 21.08% | +1.75% |
JSMD vs. MDYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. MDYG - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than MDYG's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JSMD and MDYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JSMD has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to MDYG (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs MDYG's -58.44%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.87% vs 11.88% for MDYG. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
MDYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.
JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.15% for MDYG.
MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and MDYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer