JSMD vs. IWR
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - JSMD tracks the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index while IWR tracks the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSMD returned 13.87%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for IWR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.
Performance
JSMD vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 12.62% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 13.87%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.
JSMD
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
IWR
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
JSMD vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.16% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 12.62% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and IWR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between JSMD and IWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
IWR
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
IWR
Industrials
JSMD
IWR
Healthcare
JSMD
IWR
Financial Services
JSMD
IWR
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
IWR
Basic Materials
JSMD
IWR
Communication Services
JSMD
IWR
Real Estate
JSMD
IWR
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
IWR
Energy
JSMD
IWR
Utilities
JSMD
-
IWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
IWR
JSMD vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSMD | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.58 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 9.85 | -3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and IWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -58.78% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -8.17% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -21.09% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -26.18% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | -40.59% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.45% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -7.79% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 2.13% | +2.26% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 4.61%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 4.61% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 10.46% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 13.83% | +7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 18.29% | +4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 19.36% | +3.47% |
JSMD vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IWR's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and IWR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to IWR (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs IWR's -58.78%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.87% vs 11.90% for IWR. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
IWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.
JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.19% for IWR.
IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and IWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer