PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSMD vs. IMCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSMD vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 20.55% return. Over the past 10 years, JSMD has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 13.87%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.


JSMD

1D
-1.55%
1M
4.18%
YTD
19.16%
6M
15.79%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
13.87%

IMCG

1D
-1.53%
1M
5.21%
YTD
20.55%
6M
18.49%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSMD vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.16%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
20.55%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JSMD and IMCG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.88

The correlation between JSMD and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSMD vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSMD
IMCG

Technology

28.1%
34.9%

Industrials

23.3%
25.3%

Healthcare

18.7%
6.9%

Financial Services

8.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
9.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
1.2%

Energy

1.1%
1.7%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Technology

JSMD
28.1%
IMCG
34.9%

Industrials

JSMD
23.3%
IMCG
25.3%

Healthcare

JSMD
18.7%
IMCG
6.9%

Financial Services

JSMD
8.9%
IMCG
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JSMD
8.7%
IMCG
9.1%

Basic Materials

JSMD
3.0%
IMCG
4.3%

Communication Services

JSMD
2.9%
IMCG
2.4%

Real Estate

JSMD
2.8%
IMCG
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

JSMD
2.5%
IMCG
1.2%

Energy

JSMD
1.1%
IMCG
1.7%

Utilities

JSMD

-

IMCG
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSMD vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSMD vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMDIMCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.35

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

8.95

-2.51

JSMD vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSMD and IMCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSMD vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and IMCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMDIMCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-58.96%

+19.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-10.17%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-21.92%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.18%

-35.08%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.98%

-35.08%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.53%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-9.20%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

2.66%

+1.73%

Volatility

JSMD vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) have volatilities of 7.47% and 7.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMDIMCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

7.43%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

14.09%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

16.78%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

20.37%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

20.59%

+2.24%

JSMD vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSMD vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IMCG's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.62%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.46%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JSMD and IMCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSMD has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to IMCG (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs IMCG's -58.96%.

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.83% vs 13.87% for JSMD. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.

JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.06% for IMCG.

IMCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSMD and IMCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer