JSMD vs. FBCG
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. JSMD is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSMD returned 7.35%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for FBCG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
JSMD vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSMD achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 11.60% return.
JSMD
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
FBCG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 33.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- —
JSMD vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 15.35% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 34.26% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.60% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and FBCG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between JSMD and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
FBCG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
FBCG
Industrials
JSMD
FBCG
Healthcare
JSMD
FBCG
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
FBCG
Financial Services
JSMD
FBCG
Communication Services
JSMD
FBCG
Real Estate
JSMD
FBCG
Basic Materials
JSMD
FBCG
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
FBCG
Energy
JSMD
FBCG
Utilities
JSMD
-
FBCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
FBCG
JSMD vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSMD | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.19 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 8.45 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSMD | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.75 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.80 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -43.56% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -15.17% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -27.89% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -43.56% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -4.46% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -11.47% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 3.92% | +0.49% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 6.44%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 6.44% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 14.61% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 19.05% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 25.86% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 25.76% | -2.96% |
JSMD vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.48% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and FBCG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to FBCG (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 14.88% vs 7.35% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 14.88% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
JSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.59% for FBCG.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer