JSIVX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Small Cap Value Fund (JSIVX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JSIVX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Feb 14, 1985. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSIVX Janus Henderson Small Cap Value Fund | 1.27% | 7.86% | 15.40% | 13.47% | -9.75% | 22.89% | -6.64% | 26.31% | -13.05% | 12.91% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -10.57% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSIVX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, JSIVX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 8.37%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.23% annualized return.
JSIVX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
JGLTX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -10.57%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSIVX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JSIVX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JSIVX
JGLTX
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Value Fund (JSIVX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSIVX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.29 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 4.44 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSIVX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.43 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.84 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.29 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between JSIVX and JGLTX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JSIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than JGLTX's 10.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSIVX Janus Henderson Small Cap Value Fund | 4.02% | 4.07% | 20.33% | 5.34% | 4.94% | 1.84% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 8.15% | 8.74% | 3.76% | 14.24% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 10.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSIVX drawdown since its inception was -46.98%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSIVX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSIVX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.98% | -81.78% | +34.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -15.81% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.24% | -45.18% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.58% | -45.18% | +4.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -15.81% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -36.83% | +27.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.58% | -0.71% |
Volatility
JSIVX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Small Cap Value Fund (JSIVX) is 5.23%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that JSIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JSIVX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 6.94% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 15.62% | -4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 25.03% | -3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 25.89% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 24.28% | -3.20% |