PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JRUD.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRUD.L achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than FUQA.L's 9.39% return.


JRUD.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.32%
6M
9.29%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.54%

FUQA.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.03%
6M
9.66%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JRUD.L
JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
8.45%16.18%25.22%28.37%-19.11%30.16%19.94%1.36%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
9.39%16.75%17.51%17.75%-10.69%26.66%11.54%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JRUD.L and FUQA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.77

The correlation between JRUD.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JRUD.L
FUQA.L

Technology

39.3%
36.2%

Financial Services

10.9%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.0%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
9.3%

Industrials

7.8%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.6%

Energy

3.1%
3.2%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

JRUD.L
39.3%
FUQA.L
36.2%

Financial Services

JRUD.L
10.9%
FUQA.L
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JRUD.L
10.6%
FUQA.L
9.0%

Communication Services

JRUD.L
10.5%
FUQA.L
10.1%

Healthcare

JRUD.L
8.2%
FUQA.L
9.3%

Industrials

JRUD.L
7.8%
FUQA.L
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

JRUD.L
3.9%
FUQA.L
4.6%

Energy

JRUD.L
3.1%
FUQA.L
3.2%

Utilities

JRUD.L
2.1%
FUQA.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

JRUD.L
1.8%
FUQA.L
2.1%

Real Estate

JRUD.L
1.8%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRUD.L
JRUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JRUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JRUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRUD.LFUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.43

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

10.62

-1.32

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRUD.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRUD.L and FUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRUD.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-35.38%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-7.97%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-19.14%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-20.19%

-3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.06%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-6.76%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.83%

+0.19%

Volatility

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JRUD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.58%. This indicates that JRUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRUD.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.58%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

7.44%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

9.98%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

19.95%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.83%

22.98%

-3.15%

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRUD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRUD.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

JRUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRUD.L
JPM US Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.68%0.52%0.50%0.83%1.08%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRUD.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRUD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRUD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JRUD.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRUD.L and FUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer