JRTYX vs. JLKYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JRTYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio) and JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds from John Hancock. Over the past 5 years, JRTYX returned 9.86%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for JLKYX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JRTYX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JLKYX.

Performance

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTYX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JRTYX having a 12.80% return and JLKYX slightly higher at 12.94%.

JRTYX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 5.46%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: —

JLKYX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 29.09%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRTYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio	12.80%	19.73%	15.12%	18.25%	-18.27%	18.19%	15.92%	24.68%	-8.44%	-4.63%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.94%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%	25.07%	-8.32%	-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTYX and JLKYX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017	1.00

The correlation between JRTYX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JRTYX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTYX

JRTYX Risk / Return Rank: 68
JRTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
JRTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JRTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
JRTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
JRTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTYX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRTYX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.46	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.38	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.45	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	3.24	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.15	14.36	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTYX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRTYX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.46	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.67	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.65	-0.07

Drawdowns

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTYX drawdown since its inception was -32.54%, roughly equal to the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTYX and JLKYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRTYX	JLKYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.54%	-32.55%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-9.16%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.17%	-16.11%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.89%	-25.75%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.60%	-4.66%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.06%	+0.01%

Volatility

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTYX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRTYX	JLKYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	3.55%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	9.59%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	12.05%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	15.21%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.27%	16.21%	+1.06%

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTYX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JRTYX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

JRTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than JLKYX's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.19%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%
JRTYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2050 Lifetime Portfolio	2.68%	3.02%	1.53%	1.94%	7.22%	5.55%	3.96%	8.47%	10.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRTYX and JLKYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, JRTYX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JRTYX or JLKYX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to JRTYX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTYX dropped -32.54% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.