PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRTMX vs. QMNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRTMX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than QMNNX's -6.97% return.


JRTMX

1D
0.88%
1M
1.70%
YTD
9.59%
6M
9.95%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*

QMNNX

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
-6.97%
6M
-7.35%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
18.40%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JRTMX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
9.59%16.54%11.04%15.26%-17.97%15.75%15.08%10.57%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
-6.97%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%17.38%-19.79%-3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JRTMX and QMNNX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2019

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRTMX vs. QMNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRTMX
JRTMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JRTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JRTMXQMNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.08

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

0.36

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

0.77

+12.44

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the QMNNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRTMX and QMNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRTMX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, smaller than the maximum QMNNX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRTMX and QMNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRTMXQMNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.63%

-39.22%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-8.41%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-8.41%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-13.98%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-7.35%

+7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-10.59%

+4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.91%

-2.27%

Volatility

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) at 2.45%. This indicates that JRTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRTMXQMNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.45%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

5.14%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

6.65%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

9.30%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

8.30%

+7.14%

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRTMX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNNX's 5.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

JRTMX vs. QMNNX - Dividend Comparison

JRTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than QMNNX's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRTMX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
2.30%2.52%2.12%2.26%7.16%5.67%4.72%8.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
1.35%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


JRTMX and QMNNX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JRTMX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to QMNNX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRTMX dropped -29.63% vs QMNNX's -39.22%.

JRTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRTMX and QMNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer