PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JRLLX vs. VTINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLLX) and Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund (VTINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLLX achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly higher than VTINX's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, JRLLX has outperformed VTINX with an annualized return of 6.14%, while VTINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.


JRLLX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.02%
YTD
5.44%
6M
5.71%
1Y
13.56%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
6.14%

VTINX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.12%
YTD
4.69%
6M
4.90%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
5.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JRLLX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio
5.44%11.58%6.79%10.68%-12.86%8.33%9.82%17.10%-3.86%7.77%
VTINX
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund
4.69%11.31%6.66%10.66%-12.75%5.24%10.02%13.16%-1.98%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLLX and VTINX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.94

The correlation between JRLLX and VTINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JRLLX vs. VTINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLLX
JRLLX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JRLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTINX
VTINX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLLX) and Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund (VTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JRLLXVTINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.50

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.97

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

13.09

+1.23

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the VTINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLLX and VTINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JRLLXVTINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.52

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.93

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.93

-0.24

Drawdowns

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLLX drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, which is greater than VTINX's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLLX and VTINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JRLLXVTINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.29%

-19.96%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.21%

-4.14%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.75%

-5.26%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-17.02%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.29%

-17.02%

-4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-2.20%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.94%

+0.02%

Volatility

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLLX) and Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund (VTINX) have volatilities of 1.71% and 1.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JRLLXVTINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

1.77%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

4.02%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.18%

4.88%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

6.07%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

5.73%

+2.89%

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLLX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VTINX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JRLLX vs. VTINX - Dividend Comparison

JRLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than VTINX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLLX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio
3.70%3.90%3.46%3.22%5.01%6.68%6.00%6.84%7.78%3.20%3.78%2.17%
VTINX
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund
4.80%5.02%5.89%4.01%3.08%8.63%3.42%2.62%4.19%1.56%2.27%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JRLLX and VTINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTINX has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to JRLLX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLLX dropped -21.29% vs VTINX's -19.96%.

JRLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JRLLX and VTINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer