JRLLX vs. JIBCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JRLLX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio) and JIBCX (John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - JRLLX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by John Hancock, while JIBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JRLLX returned 6.14%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for JIBCX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JRLLX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for JIBCX.

Performance

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLLX) and John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JRLLX achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly higher than JIBCX's 5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, JRLLX has underperformed JIBCX with an annualized return of 6.14%, while JIBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.

JRLLX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 5.71%
• 1Y: 13.56%
• 3Y*: 10.17%
• 5Y*: 4.68%
• 10Y*: 6.14%

JIBCX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: -3.68%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 15.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JRLLX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio	5.44%	11.58%	6.79%	10.68%	-12.86%	8.33%	9.82%	17.10%	-3.86%	7.77%
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.13%	8.28%	35.89%	49.47%	-38.12%	16.88%	34.25%	29.71%	1.72%	36.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JRLLX and JIBCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between JRLLX and JIBCX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JRLLX vs. JIBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JRLLX

JRLLX Risk / Return Rank: 78
JRLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
JRLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
JRLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JRLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
JRLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

JIBCX

JIBCX Risk / Return Rank: 7
JIBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
JIBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
JIBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
JIBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
JIBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLLX) and John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JRLLX	JIBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	0.71	+1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	1.03	+2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.14	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	0.53	+2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.32	1.27	+13.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JRLLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the JIBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JRLLX and JIBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JRLLX	JIBCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	0.71	+1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.41	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.68	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.53	+0.16

Drawdowns

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JRLLX drawdown since its inception was -21.29%, smaller than the maximum JIBCX drawdown of -54.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRLLX and JIBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JRLLX	JIBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-54.15%	+32.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.21%	-24.47%	+20.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.75%	-24.47%	+17.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-42.74%	+24.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.29%	-42.74%	+21.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.71%	+6.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-9.28%	+6.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	9.68%	-8.72%

Volatility

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLLX) is 1.71%, while John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that JRLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JRLLX	JIBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	3.62%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.22%	14.71%	-10.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.18%	18.40%	-13.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.86%	24.50%	-16.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.62%	23.02%	-14.40%

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JRLLX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than JIBCX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

JRLLX vs. JIBCX - Dividend Comparison

JRLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.97%	3.23%	5.57%	16.46%	4.72%	1.46%	7.73%	16.16%	6.35%	13.20%
JRLLX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2015 Lifetime Portfolio	3.70%	3.90%	3.46%	3.22%	5.01%	6.68%	6.00%	6.84%	7.78%	3.20%	3.78%	2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JRLLX and JIBCX in my portfolio?

JRLLX and JIBCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JRLLX or JIBCX?

JIBCX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to JRLLX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JRLLX dropped -21.29% vs JIBCX's -54.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.