PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 5.33% return.


JQUA

1D
0.41%
1M
2.90%
YTD
11.39%
6M
11.55%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
0.67%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
5.33%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQUA vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
11.39%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
5.33%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and IDMO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.68

The correlation between JQUA and IDMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

JQUA vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
IDMO

Technology

42.9%
5.3%

Financial Services

10.0%
42.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
1.4%

Industrials

7.4%
22.6%

Healthcare

7.1%
1.2%

Communication Services

5.5%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
2.5%

Energy

3.1%
1.9%

Utilities

2.1%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
10.2%

Technology

JQUA
42.9%
IDMO
5.3%

Financial Services

JQUA
10.0%
IDMO
42.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.1%
IDMO
1.4%

Industrials

JQUA
7.4%
IDMO
22.6%

Healthcare

JQUA
7.1%
IDMO
1.2%

Communication Services

JQUA
5.5%
IDMO
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.2%
IDMO
2.5%

Energy

JQUA
3.1%
IDMO
1.9%

Utilities

JQUA
2.1%
IDMO
8.4%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.1%
IDMO
2.0%

Basic Materials

JQUA
0.8%
IDMO
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQUA vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JQUAIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.57

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

6.49

+4.72

JQUA vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JQUAIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.12

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.85

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.44

+0.37

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUAIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-39.38%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-12.31%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-12.65%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-27.07%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-4.49%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-9.75%

+5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.99%

-1.28%

Volatility

JQUA vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 4.16%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUAIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

6.18%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

15.28%

-6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

17.25%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

17.90%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

18.14%

-0.13%

JQUA vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JQUA vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.10%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQUA and IDMO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to JQUA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.15% vs 13.33% for JQUA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.

JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.25% for IDMO.

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer