JQUA vs. IBIC
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JQUA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, JQUA returned 20.17% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
JQUA vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 11.30% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 6.74% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and IBIC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.03 |
The correlation between JQUA and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
IBIC
JQUA vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JQUA | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 2.22 | -0.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 16.56 | -13.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 58.67 | -47.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -0.90% | -32.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -0.27% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -0.08% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -0.10% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 0.08% | +1.67% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 0.17% | +5.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 0.67% | +8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 0.89% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 1.56% | +14.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 1.56% | +16.45% |
JQUA vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JQUA vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.10% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQUA and IBIC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, JQUA leads with 20.17% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JQUA.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.
JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer