PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 18.78% return.


JQUA

1D
0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
13.59%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%

GARP

1D
1.62%
1M
0.39%
6M
15.63%
YTD
18.78%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
30.65%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.43M$25.59M$23.01M
$27.54M$28.89M$36.27M

JQUA vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
15.84%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%14.18%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
18.78%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and GARP is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.86

The correlation between JQUA and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JQUA vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
GARP

Technology

41.0%
54.7%

Financial Services

12.0%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.1%

Industrials

8.9%
6.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
5.4%

Communication Services

6.2%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%

-

Energy

3.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.3%

Technology

JQUA
41.0%
GARP
54.7%

Financial Services

JQUA
12.0%
GARP
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.5%
GARP
9.1%

Industrials

JQUA
8.9%
GARP
6.4%

Healthcare

JQUA
8.8%
GARP
5.4%

Communication Services

JQUA
6.2%
GARP
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.2%
GARP

-

Energy

JQUA
3.3%
GARP
3.0%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.2%
GARP
0.4%

Basic Materials

JQUA
1.7%
GARP
1.1%

Utilities

JQUA
1.2%
GARP
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JQUA vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JQUAGARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.49

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

9.05

+4.30

JQUA vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and GARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUAGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-31.34%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-13.69%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-23.73%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-30.61%

+8.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.79%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-7.27%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

3.76%

-2.02%

Volatility

JQUA vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 2.46%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUAGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

5.74%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

16.02%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

20.01%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

22.36%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

23.92%

-6.00%

JQUA vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JQUA vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


JQUA and GARP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to JQUA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs GARP's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.57% vs 12.98% for JQUA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.57% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.15% for GARP.

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer