PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, JPUS has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.


JPUS

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.44%
6M
10.33%
YTD
14.88%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
11.41%

SCHX

1D
-1.01%
1M
0.68%
6M
7.83%
YTD
9.52%
1Y
19.09%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
14.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
14.88%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
9.52%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and SCHX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between JPUS and SCHX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JPUS vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
SCHX

Technology

12.7%
38.3%

Healthcare

11.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
4.4%

Real Estate

10.5%
2.0%

Industrials

10.3%
8.6%

Utilities

9.1%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.8%

Financial Services

7.8%
11.1%

Basic Materials

7.0%
1.8%

Energy

6.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

4.6%
10.3%

Technology

JPUS
12.7%
SCHX
38.3%

Healthcare

JPUS
11.6%
SCHX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.0%
SCHX
4.4%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.5%
SCHX
2.0%

Industrials

JPUS
10.3%
SCHX
8.6%

Utilities

JPUS
9.1%
SCHX
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.6%
SCHX
9.8%

Financial Services

JPUS
7.8%
SCHX
11.1%

Basic Materials

JPUS
7.0%
SCHX
1.8%

Energy

JPUS
6.8%
SCHX
3.2%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.6%
SCHX
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPUSSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.12

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

9.09

+3.29

JPUS vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-34.33%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-9.02%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-19.04%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-25.41%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

-34.33%

-4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.78%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-3.95%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.10%

-0.39%

Volatility

JPUS vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.53%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.41%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

10.07%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

12.71%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

17.23%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

18.13%

-1.42%

JPUS vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than SCHX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.98%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and SCHX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to JPUS (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 14.93% vs 11.41% for JPUS. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.

JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.03% for SCHX.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer