PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, JPUS has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 11.34%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.70% annualized return.


JPUS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.42%
6M
11.13%
YTD
14.38%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
11.34%

SCHB

1D
0.38%
1M
1.59%
6M
9.10%
YTD
11.43%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
14.38%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.43%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and SCHB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between JPUS and SCHB has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JPUS vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
SCHB

Technology

12.7%
37.3%

Healthcare

11.6%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

10.5%
2.3%

Industrials

10.3%
9.1%

Utilities

9.1%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.8%

Financial Services

7.8%
11.4%

Basic Materials

7.0%
1.9%

Energy

6.8%
3.3%

Communication Services

4.6%
9.8%

Technology

JPUS
12.7%
SCHB
37.3%

Healthcare

JPUS
11.6%
SCHB
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.0%
SCHB
4.3%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.5%
SCHB
2.3%

Industrials

JPUS
10.3%
SCHB
9.1%

Utilities

JPUS
9.1%
SCHB
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.6%
SCHB
9.8%

Financial Services

JPUS
7.8%
SCHB
11.4%

Basic Materials

JPUS
7.0%
SCHB
1.9%

Energy

JPUS
6.8%
SCHB
3.3%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.6%
SCHB
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPUSSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.46

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

10.73

+0.97

JPUS vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-35.27%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-8.91%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-19.34%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-25.41%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

-35.27%

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.59%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-4.10%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.04%

-0.33%

Volatility

JPUS vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.42%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.72%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

10.15%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

12.84%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

17.36%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

18.31%

-1.60%

JPUS vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than SCHB's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.99%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and SCHB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to JPUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 14.70% vs 11.34% for JPUS. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.03% for SCHB.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer