PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.16% return.


JPUS

1D
0.41%
1M
1.08%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.08%
1Y
21.76%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.47%

JQUA

1D
-0.11%
1M
7.20%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.37%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
12.01%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%3.96%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
14.16%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and JQUA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.84

The correlation between JPUS and JQUA shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JPUS vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
JQUA

Technology

11.6%
41.9%

Healthcare

11.5%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
5.3%

Real Estate

10.5%
2.1%

Industrials

10.4%
7.6%

Utilities

9.5%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.2%

Financial Services

8.0%
10.2%

Energy

7.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

6.8%
0.8%

Communication Services

4.5%
5.5%

Technology

JPUS
11.6%
JQUA
41.9%

Healthcare

JPUS
11.5%
JQUA
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.3%
JQUA
5.3%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.5%
JQUA
2.1%

Industrials

JPUS
10.4%
JQUA
7.6%

Utilities

JPUS
9.5%
JQUA
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.6%
JQUA
9.2%

Financial Services

JPUS
8.0%
JQUA
10.2%

Energy

JPUS
7.3%
JQUA
3.2%

Basic Materials

JPUS
6.8%
JQUA
0.8%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.5%
JQUA
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPUSJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.20

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

13.48

-0.76

JPUS vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPUSJQUADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.90

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.83

-0.11

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-32.92%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.13%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-16.81%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-22.47%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-4.16%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.69%

+0.03%

Volatility

JPUS vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.82%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

8.31%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

11.20%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.61%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

17.99%

-1.24%

JPUS vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.04%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and JQUA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPUS has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to JQUA (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.92% vs 9.49% for JPUS. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.

JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JQUA is Large Cap Growth Equities. JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.12% for JQUA.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer