PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. JPME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. JPME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than JPME's 17.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPUS having a 11.51% annualized return and JPME not far behind at 10.97%.


JPUS

1D
0.53%
1M
1.30%
6M
11.04%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
11.51%
ALL TIME*
12.18%

JPME

1D
0.64%
1M
1.45%
6M
12.25%
YTD
17.41%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$974.76K$1.55M$1.43M
$730.62K$1.08M$1.02M

JPUS vs. JPME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
16.20%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
17.41%8.26%13.55%11.28%-10.12%28.90%8.46%25.87%-8.92%19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and JPME is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016

0.95

The correlation between JPUS and JPME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JPUS vs. JPME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
JPME

Healthcare

12.7%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
9.9%

Real Estate

10.7%
11.6%

Utilities

10.0%
10.1%

Technology

9.5%
9.2%

Financial Services

8.8%
9.0%

Industrials

8.7%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
8.6%

Energy

7.3%
7.6%

Basic Materials

7.2%
7.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

JPUS
12.7%
JPME
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.1%
JPME
9.9%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.7%
JPME
11.6%

Utilities

JPUS
10.0%
JPME
10.1%

Technology

JPUS
9.5%
JPME
9.2%

Financial Services

JPUS
8.8%
JPME
9.0%

Industrials

JPUS
8.7%
JPME
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.4%
JPME
8.6%

Energy

JPUS
7.3%
JPME
7.6%

Basic Materials

JPUS
7.2%
JPME
7.8%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.3%
JPME
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. JPME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JPME
JPME Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JPME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPME Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
JPME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPME Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPUS vs. JPME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPUSJPMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.63

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

13.92

+0.40

JPUS vs. JPME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the JPME Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and JPME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. JPME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, smaller than the maximum JPME drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and JPME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSJPMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-41.01%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-6.84%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-18.70%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-19.30%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

-41.01%

+2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.48%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-4.33%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.78%

-0.11%

Volatility

JPUS vs. JPME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.47%, while JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSJPMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.67%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

8.53%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

11.84%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

16.08%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.64%

-0.92%

JPUS vs. JPME - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JPME's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. JPME - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than JPME's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPME
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.73%2.03%1.77%1.84%1.84%1.44%1.51%1.68%1.80%1.17%0.91%0.00%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
1.96%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JPUS and JPME move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JPME has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to JPUS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs JPME's -41.01%.

On 10-year performance, JPUS leads with 11.51% vs 10.97% for JPME. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 11.51% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPME.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.73% for JPME.

JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JPME is Mid Cap Blend Equities. JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.24% for JPME.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and JPME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer