JPUS vs. BUFX
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
JPUS vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.84% return.
JPUS
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPUS vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 12.21% | 6.92% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 3.84% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and BUFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
BUFX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JPUS vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPUS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -2.87% | -35.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.59% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -0.24% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility
JPUS vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 4.05% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 4.05% | +10.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 4.05% | +12.70% |
JPUS vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPUS vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and BUFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer