JPUS vs. AFOS
JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
JPUS vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPUS vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 11.55% | 6.97% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPUS and AFOS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPUS vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
JPUS
AFOS
JPUS vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPUS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPUS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 4.35 | -3.63 |
Drawdowns
JPUS vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPUS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.69% | -11.52% | -27.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.29% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -1.37% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility
JPUS vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPUS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 20.19% | -9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 20.19% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 20.19% | -3.43% |
JPUS vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPUS vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPUS and AFOS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for JPUS and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer