PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPTC.L achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than JGRE.L's 9.61% return.


JPTC.L

1D
0.45%
1M
4.58%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.98%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*

JGRE.L

1D
0.12%
1M
4.66%
YTD
9.61%
6M
10.05%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JPTC.L
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
6.75%11.44%20.36%16.17%-8.74%25.32%0.92%
JGRE.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.61%11.65%20.63%18.59%-7.77%25.92%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JPTC.L and JGRE.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.73

Over the past year, JPTC.L and JGRE.L have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.73, meaning their price movements have been converging.

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPTC.L
JGRE.L

Technology

29.7%
28.6%

Financial Services

16.0%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
10.1%

Industrials

10.5%
11.3%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.2%

Utilities

2.8%
2.9%

Energy

2.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

JPTC.L
29.7%
JGRE.L
28.6%

Financial Services

JPTC.L
16.0%
JGRE.L
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JPTC.L
11.3%
JGRE.L
10.1%

Industrials

JPTC.L
10.5%
JGRE.L
11.3%

Communication Services

JPTC.L
9.8%
JGRE.L
9.1%

Healthcare

JPTC.L
8.9%
JGRE.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

JPTC.L
3.8%
JGRE.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

JPTC.L
3.5%
JGRE.L
3.2%

Utilities

JPTC.L
2.8%
JGRE.L
2.9%

Energy

JPTC.L
2.0%
JGRE.L
4.2%

Real Estate

JPTC.L
1.8%
JGRE.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPTC.L

JGRE.L
JGRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPTC.LJGRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.93

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

16.25

-6.08

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPTC.L and JGRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPTC.LJGRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.59

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

1.01

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.92

+0.19

Drawdowns

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPTC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, smaller than the maximum JGRE.L drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPTC.L and JGRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPTC.LJGRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-25.31%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-6.65%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.17%

-18.49%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-18.49%

-0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.17%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-3.10%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.61%

+0.51%

Volatility

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPTC.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPTC.LJGRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.48%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

7.20%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

10.12%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

13.16%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

15.06%

+0.17%

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPTC.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JGRE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPTC.L vs. JGRE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPTC.L nor JGRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JPTC.L and JGRE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JPTC.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPTC.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JGRE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JPTC.L and 0.25% for JGRE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPTC.L and JGRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer